Judges should provide scores based on objective characteristics of the performance, taking into account their subjective impressions. Scores should be substantiated to ensure a fair and just decision on the winner of the Simsovision contest.
The scoring scale from 0 to 10 represents a range in which the judges can assign scores for each criterion.
Voting date until September 7 inclusive.
— Minimum score: 0 — The performance does not align with the criteria at all.
— Maximum score: 10 — The performance perfectly aligns with the criteria and impresses on all levels.
- Artist and Participant Stage Presence:
— Description: Evaluation of how well the images of the artists and other participants in the performance are developed and correspond to the character and style of the musical piece.
— Grounds for lowering the score: Unjustified discrepancies between the image and the character of the music, insufficiently thought-out image, violation of style and theme.
- Impression from the Performance:
— Description: Evaluation of the overall impression of the performance, including emotional appeal, originality, and the quality of execution.
— Grounds for lowering the score: Lack of originality, lack of emotional connection with the audience, poor choice of musical material.
- Use of Animation Poses:
— Description: Evaluation of how well the animation movements and poses of the artists and other participants are developed and realistic.
— Grounds for lowering the score: Severe errors in animation, unnatural or illogical character movements.
- Stage Setting:
— Description: Evaluation of the level of detail and alignment of stage decorations, lighting, and other stage elements with the musical performance.
— Grounds for lowering the score: Mismatch between decorations or lighting and the musical performance, insufficient attention to stage details.
- Recording Quality:
— Description: Evaluation of the technical quality of the performance recording, including image clarity, proper framing, and adequate lighting.
— Grounds for lowering the score: Blurred image (except for intentional use of blurring), poor lighting, improper framing, significant technical flaws.
- Editing Quality:
— Description: Evaluation of how well the video is edited, including transitions between shots, use of special effects, and synchronization with the music.
— Grounds for lowering the score: Rough transitions, illogical editing decisions, mismatch between the editing and the musical composition.
- Relationship Between Performance and Song:
— Description: Evaluation of how well the musical composition aligns with the concept of the performance and how it complements the animation movements and artist images.
— Grounds for lowering the score: Inappropriate song choice for the performance, mismatch between the musical material and animation movements or artist images.
- Artist and Participant Stage Presence:
— 0: Complete lack of developed images, no correspondence to the performance’s theme.
— 5: Artist images somewhat align with the musical composition, with some elements developed.
— 10: Perfectly developed images, complete alignment with the performance’s style, outstanding costumes and makeup.
- Impression from the Performance:
— 0: The performance elicits negative emotions, total misunderstanding, and disappointment.
— 5: Mixed emotions from the performance, some interesting moments, but overall impression is ambiguous.
— 10: The performance is impressive, evokes positive emotions, leaves a strong and unforgettable impression.
- Use of Animation Poses:
— 0: Poorly executed animation, characters’ movements look unnatural.
— 5: Some poses appear realistic, but there are animation flaws.
— 10: Animation poses are executed perfectly, character movements appear highly realistic.
- Stage Setting:
— 0: Stage setting doesn’t match the performance’s theme, poorly chosen decorations.
— 5: Some elements correspond to the performance’s theme, but the overall setting doesn’t convey the intended concept.
— 10: Decorations, lighting, and stage elements create a perfect match with the theme and mood of the performance.
- Recording Quality:
— 0: Recording quality has numerous technical flaws, is unreadable, and has poor lighting.
— 5: Recording quality is satisfactory, but there are areas that need improvement.
— 10: Outstanding recording quality, clear image, proper lighting, and framing.
- Editing Quality:
— 0: Editing is done carelessly, with glaring errors.
— 5: Some good editing work, but there are illogical transitions and editing choices.
— 10: Editing is flawless, transitions and special effects harmonize with the music and create an impressive presentation.
- Relationship Between Performance and Song:
— 0: Complete mismatch between the performance and the chosen song.
— 5: Some elements of the performance align with the song, but there are inconsistencies.
— 10: Perfect alignment between the performance and the musical composition, they complement each other seamlessly.
Voting form
The jury voting is over!
